🔗 Share this article

While dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained confined in a enclosed conference room, unaware whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in strained discussions, with scores ministers representing various coalitions of countries from the least developed nations to the most developed economies.

Frustration mounted, the air heavy as exhausted delegates acknowledged the sobering reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The 30th UN climate conference teetered on the brink of complete breakdown.

The sticking point: Fossil fuels

As science has told us for well over a century, the greenhouse gases produced by burning fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to critical levels.

Yet, during nearly three decades of yearly climate meetings, the essential necessity to halt fossil fuel use has been referenced only once – in a decision made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "transition away from fossil fuels". Delegates from the Middle Eastern nations, Russia, and multiple other countries were resolved this would not occur another time.

Increasing pressure for change

Simultaneously, a growing number of countries were equally determined that movement on this issue was vitally needed. They had formulated a proposal that was earning growing support and made it evident they were willing to hold firm.

Less wealthy nations urgently needed to move forward on securing economic resources to help them manage the already disastrous impacts of climate disasters.

Breaking point

By the early hours of Saturday, some delegates were ready to withdraw and force a collapse. "We were close for us," remarked one government representative. "I was prepared to walk away."

The pivotal moment occurred through discussions with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, senior representatives split from the main group to hold a confidential discussion with the head Saudi negotiator. They encouraged text that would obliquely recognise the global commitment to "transition away from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unanticipated resolution

Instead of explicitly namechecking fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly agreed to the wording.

The room expressed relief. Cheers erupted. The deal was completed.

With what became known as the "Brazil agreement", the world took a modest advance towards the phaseout of fossil fuels – a hesitant, inadequate step that will minimally impact the climate's steady march towards disaster. But nevertheless a notable change from total inaction.

Key elements of the agreement

• Alongside the subtle acknowledgment in the legally agreed text, countries will commence creating a plan to phase out fossil fuels
• This will be mostly a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will report back next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to stay within the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries secured a tripling to $120bn of annual finance to help them adapt to the impacts of environmental crises
• This amount will not be fully available until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "fair adjustment program" to help people working in fossil fuel sectors shift to the clean economy

Varied responses

While our planet hovers near the brink of climate "tipping points" that could eliminate habitats and throw whole regions into crisis, the agreement was far from the "major breakthrough" needed.

"The summit provided some small advances in the right direction, but in light of the scale of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," cautioned one climate expert.

This limited deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the political challenges – including a American leader who ignored the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the rising tide of conservative movements, ongoing conflicts in various areas, unacceptable degrees of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"Major polluters – the fossil fuel giants – were finally in the focus at these negotiations," notes one policy convener. "We have crossed a threshold on that. The platform is accessible. Now we must turn it into a real fire escape to a safer world."

Deep fissures revealed

Although nations were able to welcome the official adoption of the deal, Cop30 also highlighted deep fissures in the primary worldwide framework for addressing the climate crisis.

"UN negotiations are agreement-dependent, and in a period of international tensions, unanimity is progressively challenging to reach," observed one global leader. "We should not suggest that Cop30 has delivered everything that is needed. The disparity between where we are and what research requires remains alarmingly large."

If the world is to avoid the most severe impacts of climate crisis, the global discussions alone will prove insufficient.