The Way the Trial of an Army Veteran Regarding Bloody Sunday Concluded in Acquittal
Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as one of the most deadly – and significant – occasions in multiple decades of unrest in this area.
In the streets where it happened – the memories of Bloody Sunday are displayed on the structures and embedded in people's minds.
A public gathering was held on a wintry, sunny afternoon in the city.
The protest was challenging the practice of imprisonment without charges – imprisoning people without due process – which had been put in place after three years of conflict.
Soldiers from the specialized division killed 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a strongly republican area.
One image became particularly iconic.
Images showed a Catholic priest, Father Daly, waving a stained with blood cloth as he tried to protect a crowd carrying a teenager, the injured teenager, who had been killed.
Media personnel captured extensive video on the day.
Historical records features Father Daly telling a media representative that soldiers "gave the impression they would discharge weapons randomly" and he was "completely sure" that there was no reason for the discharge of weapons.
The narrative of what happened was rejected by the initial investigation.
The first investigation determined the soldiers had been attacked first.
In the negotiation period, the administration commissioned another inquiry, following pressure by family members, who said the first investigation had been a cover-up.
During 2010, the report by the investigation said that overall, the military personnel had discharged weapons initially and that not one of the victims had been armed.
The contemporary Prime Minister, the Prime Minister, issued an apology in the House of Commons – stating killings were "unjustified and unacceptable."
Authorities commenced investigate the events.
One former paratrooper, referred to as the defendant, was prosecuted for murder.
Accusations were made concerning the fatalities of one victim, in his twenties, and in his mid-twenties the second individual.
The accused was additionally charged of seeking to harm several people, Joseph Friel, more people, Michael Quinn, and an unidentified individual.
There is a legal order maintaining the soldier's identity protection, which his attorneys have claimed is necessary because he is at threat.
He told the investigation that he had solely shot at individuals who were carrying weapons.
The statement was dismissed in the final report.
Material from the examination would not be used directly as proof in the court case.
In the dock, the defendant was hidden from public behind a protective barrier.
He addressed the court for the first time in court at a session in late 2024, to respond "not responsible" when the charges were put to him.
Family members of those who were killed on that day travelled from the city to the judicial building every day of the trial.
A family member, whose brother Michael was killed, said they were aware that attending the proceedings would be difficult.
"I can see all details in my recollection," he said, as we visited the primary sites mentioned in the trial – from Rossville Street, where Michael was killed, to the nearby the courtyard, where James Wray and another victim were died.
"It reminds me to my position that day.
"I helped to carry the victim and put him in the vehicle.
"I went through the entire event during the testimony.
"Despite enduring everything – it's still worthwhile for me."